On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 11:37:23AM -0500, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/21/25 10:24 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Good morning,
> > 
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 02:30:47PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> > > AMD-Xilinx platform driver does not support iommu or recovery mechanism
> > > yet. Disable both features in platform driver.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.s...@amd.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 2 ++
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c 
> > > b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> > > index a51523456c6e..0ffd26a47685 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> > > @@ -938,6 +938,8 @@ static struct zynqmp_r5_core 
> > > *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
> > >           rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(r5_rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_ARM);
> > > + r5_rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
> > 
> > If recovery is not supported, and it is set explicitly here, does it mean 
> > the
> > present upstream code is broken?  And if it is broken, how was this tested 
> > in
> > the first place?
> 
> I think upstream code can be improved to change "recovery_disabled" to
> "recovery_enabled" and set it in each platform driver if feature is
> supported and keep it disabled by default.
> 
> When upstreaming base driver I wasn't aware that there is recovery feature
> in remoteproc until recently when I started working on it. I guess too
> focused on fixing base driver features. That is how I missed to add
> recovery_disabled and test it as well.
> 
> That is why it's better idea to replace "recovery_disabled" with
> "recovery_enabled" and keep recovery feature disabled by default. Same as
> "has_iommu". So platform drivers enable it if they actually support it.
> 
> I will add recovery feature for xlnx platform later, but until then it's
> better to disable it in the platform driver.
>

I have applied this set.
 
> Thanks,
> Tanmay
> 
> > 
> > > + r5_rproc->has_iommu = false;
> > >           r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
> > >           r5_core = r5_rproc->priv;
> > >           r5_core->dev = cdev;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.34.1
> > > 
> 

Reply via email to