On 15/08/2025 00:08, Duje Mihanović wrote: > On Monday, 11 August 2025 08:38:15 Central European Summer Time > Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 08/08/2025 21:46, Duje Mihanović wrote: >>> On Friday, 8 August 2025 09:34:54 Central European Summer Time Krzysztof >>> Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 07:33:21PM +0200, Duje Mihanović wrote: >>>>> + A number of phandles to clocks that need to be enabled during >>>>> domain + power up. >>>> >>>> This does not exist in your example, so it is just confusing. >>> >>> This is because I have not implemented any of the clocks used by the >>> domains at this moment. >>> >>> Actually, I am not sure anymore whether it is necessary to assign >>> clocks to the domains as I have just yesterday successfully brought up >>> the GPU with some out-of-tree code and that did not require giving the >>> domains any clocks even though the vendor kernel does this. Should I >>> just go with that and drop all clock handling from the power domain >>> driver, at which point there would be no need for the individual domain >>> nodes? If not, how should I in the future assign clocks to the domains? >> >> I am asking to see complete binding with complete DTS in example and >> submitted to SoC maintainer. > > Hm, so if in the example (and the actual DTS) each domain is assigned a > clock, > can I then keep the domain and domain controller nodes like Mediatek and > Rockchip have?
You would need to point me to specific files or show some code. > > Does SoC maintainer here mean the SoC mailing list or the maintainer of the > particular SoC family in question? I meant rather post complete DTS to mailing lists (so maintainer of given SoC family can see it as well), does not have to be the same patchset. Best regards, Krzysztof
