On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 7:49 PM Edgecombe, Rick P <rick.p.edgeco...@intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-08-07 at 13:16 -0700, Sagi Shahar wrote: > > +#define XFEATURE_MASK_CET (XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER | > > XFEATURE_MASK_CET_KERNEL) > > + > > +static void tdx_apply_cpuid_restrictions(struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid_data) > > +{ > > + for (int i = 0; i < cpuid_data->nent; i++) { > > + struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *e = &cpuid_data->entries[i]; > > + > > + if (e->function == 0xd && e->index == 0) { > > + /* > > + * TDX module requires both XTILE_{CFG, DATA} to be > > set. > > + * Both bits are required for AMX to be functional. > > + */ > > + if ((e->eax & XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE) != > > + XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE) { > > + e->eax &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE; > > + } > > + } > > + if (e->function == 0xd && e->index == 1) { > > + /* > > + * TDX doesn't support LBR yet. > > + * Disable bits from the XCR0 register. > > + */ > > + e->ecx &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_LBR; > > + /* > > + * TDX modules requires both CET_{U, S} to be set even > > + * if only one is supported. > > + */ > > + if (e->ecx & XFEATURE_MASK_CET) > > + e->ecx |= XFEATURE_MASK_CET; > > + } > > + } > > +} > > Since this is only going to be used control the directly configurable bits, do > we really need to do this? SET_CPUID2 will just get what comes out of > KVM_TDX_GET_CPUID, so it should pick up the correct values. >
This code is used before vcpus are created so KVM_TDX_GET_CPUID can't be used here. But either way, I removed this function in the next version. > > <snip> > > > + > > +static void tdx_td_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint64_t attributes) > > +{ > > + struct kvm_tdx_init_vm *init_vm; > > + const struct kvm_cpuid2 *tmp; > > + struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid; > > + > > + tmp = kvm_get_supported_cpuid(); > > + > > + cpuid = allocate_kvm_cpuid2(KVM_MAX_CPUID_ENTRIES); > > + memcpy(cpuid, tmp, kvm_cpuid2_size(tmp->nent)); > > + tdx_mask_cpuid_features(cpuid); > > + > > + init_vm = calloc(1, sizeof(*init_vm) + > > + sizeof(init_vm->cpuid.entries[0]) * cpuid->nent); > > + TEST_ASSERT(init_vm, "vm allocation failed"); > > + > > + memcpy(&init_vm->cpuid, cpuid, kvm_cpuid2_size(cpuid->nent)); > > + free(cpuid); > > + > > + init_vm->attributes = attributes; > > + > > + tdx_apply_cpuid_restrictions(&init_vm->cpuid); > > + tdx_filter_cpuid(vm, &init_vm->cpuid); > > + > > + tdx_ioctl(vm->fd, KVM_TDX_INIT_VM, 0, init_vm); > > + free(init_vm); > > +} > > We should comment the CPUID twiddling that happens here. It masks, filters, > and > applies restrictions. Sounds like all the same thing. > > >