Hi Sakari, Am Mittwoch, dem 17.09.2025 um 13:10 +0300 schrieb Sakari Ailus: > Hi André, Val, > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 05:08:44PM -0300, Val Packett wrote: > > > > On 9/15/25 5:48 PM, André Apitzsch wrote: > > > Hi Sakari, > > > > > > @Val, please see below. > > > > > > Am Montag, dem 18.08.2025 um 07:44 +0000 schrieb Sakari Ailus: > > > > Hi André, > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 07:09:26PM +0200, André Apitzsch via B4 > > > > Relay wrote: > > > > > u64 val; > > > > > int ret; > > > > > int err; > > > > > @@ -109,13 +116,15 @@ static int dw9719_power_up(struct > > > > > dw9719_device *dw9719, bool detect) > > > > > if (ret) > > > > > return ret; > > > > > - /* Jiggle SCL pin to wake up device */ > > > > > - reg_pwr = (dw9719->model == DW9718S) ? DW9718S_PD : > > > > > DW9719_CONTROL; > > > > > - cci_write(dw9719->regmap, reg_pwr, DW9719_SHUTDOWN, > > > > > &ret); > > > > > - fsleep(100); > > > > > + /* > > > > > + * Need 100us to transition from SHUTDOWN to > > > > > STANDBY. > > > > > + * Jiggle the SCL pin to wake up the device (even > > > > > when the > > > > > regulator > > > > > + * is shared) and wait double the time to be sure, > > > > > then > > > > > retry the write. > > > > Why double? Isn't the datasheet correct when it comes to the > > > > power-on sequence? > > > > > > > I haven't noticed any problems during power-up of DW9761. > > > However, according to the commit message, there seems be an issue > > > with DW9718S. But I don't own the device and cannot test it. > > > > > > Maybe Val can provided some additional information. > > > > I haven't had access to the datasheet for the DW9718S, so this was > > all deduced experimentally. By "to be sure" I meant that I > > literally raised the timeout "just in case", not based on actual > > issues. > > > > The actually important change was expecting the failure on the > > write and not erroring out. > > Ack. > > André: could you add this information to the comment as well?
Could you clarify which information. Best regards, André
