Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> In the snippets like the following
> 
>       if (...)
>               return / goto / break / continue ...;
>       else
>               ...
> 
> the 'else' is redundant. Get rid of it.
> 

I still need a why to in this commit message.

[snip]

> @@ -768,20 +768,20 @@ static const guid_t *to_abstraction_guid(enum 
> nvdimm_claim_class claim_class,
>  {
>       if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT)
>               return &nvdimm_btt_guid;
> -     else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT2)
> +     if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT2)
>               return &nvdimm_btt2_guid;
> -     else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_PFN)
> +     if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_PFN)
>               return &nvdimm_pfn_guid;
> -     else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_DAX)
> +     if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_DAX)
>               return &nvdimm_dax_guid;
> -     else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_UNKNOWN) {
> -             /*
> -              * If we're modifying a namespace for which we don't
> -              * know the claim_class, don't touch the existing guid.
> -              */
> -             return target;
> -     } else
> +     if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_NONE)
>               return &guid_null;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * If we're modifying a namespace for which we don't
> +      * know the claim_class, don't touch the existing guid.
> +      */
> +     return target;

This is not an equivalent change.

>  }
>  
>  /* CXL labels store UUIDs instead of GUIDs for the same data */
> @@ -790,20 +790,20 @@ static const uuid_t *to_abstraction_uuid(enum 
> nvdimm_claim_class claim_class,
>  {
>       if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT)
>               return &nvdimm_btt_uuid;
> -     else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT2)
> +     if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT2)
>               return &nvdimm_btt2_uuid;
> -     else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_PFN)
> +     if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_PFN)
>               return &nvdimm_pfn_uuid;
> -     else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_DAX)
> +     if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_DAX)
>               return &nvdimm_dax_uuid;
> -     else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_UNKNOWN) {
> -             /*
> -              * If we're modifying a namespace for which we don't
> -              * know the claim_class, don't touch the existing uuid.
> -              */
> -             return target;
> -     } else
> +     if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_NONE)
>               return &uuid_null;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * If we're modifying a namespace for which we don't
> +      * know the claim_class, don't touch the existing uuid.
> +      */
> +     return target;

This is not an equivalent change.

Ira

[snip]

Reply via email to