On 11/23/25 11:27, Mike Rapoport wrote:
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <[email protected]>

When a VMA is registered with userfaulfd in minor mode, its ->fault()
method should check if a folio exists in the page cache and if yes
->fault() should call handle_userfault(VM_UFFD_MISSING).

Instead of calling handle_userfault() directly from a specific ->fault()
implementation introduce new fault reason VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR that will
notify the core page fault handler that it should call
handle_userfaultfd(VM_UFFD_MISSING) to complete a page fault.

Replace a call to handle_userfault(VM_UFFD_MISSING) in shmem and use the
new VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR there instead.

Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]>
---
  include/linux/mm_types.h | 3 +++
  mm/memory.c              | 2 ++
  mm/shmem.c               | 2 +-
  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 90e5790c318f..eb135369940f 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -1523,6 +1523,8 @@ typedef __bitwise unsigned int vm_fault_t;
   *                            fsync() to complete (for synchronous page faults
   *                            in DAX)
   * @VM_FAULT_COMPLETED:               ->fault completed, meanwhile mmap lock 
released
+ * @VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR:       ->fault did not modify page tables and needs
+ *                             handle_userfault(VM_UFFD_MINOR) to complete
   * @VM_FAULT_HINDEX_MASK:     mask HINDEX value
   *
   */
@@ -1540,6 +1542,7 @@ enum vm_fault_reason {
        VM_FAULT_DONE_COW       = (__force vm_fault_t)0x001000,
        VM_FAULT_NEEDDSYNC      = (__force vm_fault_t)0x002000,
        VM_FAULT_COMPLETED      = (__force vm_fault_t)0x004000,
+       VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR     = (__force vm_fault_t)0x008000,
        VM_FAULT_HINDEX_MASK    = (__force vm_fault_t)0x0f0000,
  };
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index b59ae7ce42eb..94acbac8cefb 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -5279,6 +5279,8 @@ static vm_fault_t __do_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
        }
ret = vma->vm_ops->fault(vmf);
+       if (unlikely(ret & VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR))
+               return handle_userfault(vmf, VM_UFFD_MINOR);

If we could define VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR to be 0 without USERFAULTFD, we could optimize that check out completely on such configs.


--
Cheers

David

Reply via email to