On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:21:42 +0900, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > Have you investigated the other callers? Given problems with previous
> > > version of this patch I'm worried you have not. If you did please extend
> > > the commit message with the appropriate explanation.
> > Are you asking if I investigated other zerocopy tests? NO.
>
> I said callers. You're changing behavior of a function, is it going
> to break any of the callers.
I investigated the relevant callers and found no similar restore/revert
operations. Furthermore, if such a restore action existed, the ZC
related test programs would have detected it, just as the tests
detected the revert operation in skb_zerocopy_iter_stream().
