On 11. Dec 2025, at 21:15, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 04:48:08PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote: >>> On 10. Dec 2025, at 16:32, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 02:00:35PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote: >>>>> Immediately break out of both loops when 'ret != SGX_UNMASKED_EVENT' >>>>> instead of checking for the same condition again in the outer loop. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <[email protected]> >>>>> --- >>>>> [...] >>>> >>>> I don't think moving code around is very useful. >>> >>> The patch doesn't actually move any code around, but it removes up to 50 >>> (SGX_EINIT_SLEEP_COUNT) duplicate and therefore unnecessary if checks in >>> the outer for loop. >> >> Temporary change for generating disassembly: >> [...] > > It pretty much does what I said i.e., shuffles a new location for a code > block.
GCC emits a much larger diff; however, discussing the patch based solely on the disassembled code probably isn't very meaningful. Thanks, Thorsten
