On 12/19/25 7:51 AM, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote: > It would probably require some work on the test but I think it could > benefit from using two different network namespaces. Currently it is > using PEER_NS and the default. I think avoiding the default one is > beneficial for everyone as it ensures the state is clean and that the > test won't interrupt the system connectivity. > > Other tests already do that, e.g some tests in fib_tests.sh use ns1 and > ns2 namespaces. > > What do you all think?
agreed.
