Hi Mark, On 12/19/25 19:28, Mark Brown wrote: > Currently when set_id_regs encounters a problem checking validation of > writes to feature registers it uses an immediately fatal assert to report > the problem. This is not idiomatic for kselftest, and it is also not great > for usability. The affected bitfield is not clearly reported and further > tests do not have their results reported. > > Switch to using standard kselftest result reporting for the two asserts > we do, these are non-fatal asserts so allow the program to continue and the > test names include the affected field. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
This one also looks good to me. I'm not aware of why the asserts have been favoured previously though. Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <[email protected]> Thanks, Ben
