On Fri, Jan 2, 2026 at 11:20 PM Bui Quang Minh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> When we fail to refill the receive buffers, we schedule a delayed worker
> to retry later. However, this worker creates some concurrency issues
> such as races and deadlocks. To simplify the logic and avoid further
> problems, we will instead retry refilling in the next NAPI poll.
>
> Fixes: 4bc12818b363 ("virtio-net: disable delayed refill when pausing rx")
> Reported-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
> Closes: 
> https://netdev-ctrl.bots.linux.dev/logs/vmksft/drv-hw-dbg/results/400961/3-xdp-py/stderr
> Cc: [email protected]
> Suggested-by: Xuan Zhuo <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 1bb3aeca66c6..ac514c9383ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -3035,7 +3035,7 @@ static int virtnet_receive_packets(struct virtnet_info 
> *vi,
>  }
>
>  static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
> -                          unsigned int *xdp_xmit)
> +                          unsigned int *xdp_xmit, bool *retry_refill)
>  {
>         struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>         struct virtnet_rq_stats stats = {};
> @@ -3047,12 +3047,8 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, 
> int budget,
>                 packets = virtnet_receive_packets(vi, rq, budget, xdp_xmit, 
> &stats);
>
>         if (rq->vq->num_free > min((unsigned int)budget, 
> virtqueue_get_vring_size(rq->vq)) / 2) {
> -               if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
> -                       spin_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
> -                       if (vi->refill_enabled)
> -                               schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> -                       spin_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
> -               }
> +               if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC))
> +                       *retry_refill = true;
>         }
>
>         u64_stats_set(&stats.packets, packets);
> @@ -3129,18 +3125,18 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int 
> budget)
>         struct send_queue *sq;
>         unsigned int received;
>         unsigned int xdp_xmit = 0;
> -       bool napi_complete;
> +       bool napi_complete, retry_refill = false;
>
>         virtnet_poll_cleantx(rq, budget);
>
> -       received = virtnet_receive(rq, budget, &xdp_xmit);
> +       received = virtnet_receive(rq, budget, &xdp_xmit, &retry_refill);

I think we can simply let virtnet_receive() to return the budget when
reill fails.

>         rq->packets_in_napi += received;
>
>         if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_REDIR)
>                 xdp_do_flush();
>
>         /* Out of packets? */
> -       if (received < budget) {
> +       if (received < budget && !retry_refill) {
>                 napi_complete = virtqueue_napi_complete(napi, rq->vq, 
> received);
>                 /* Intentionally not taking dim_lock here. This may result in 
> a
>                  * spurious net_dim call. But if that happens 
> virtnet_rx_dim_work
> @@ -3160,7 +3156,7 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int 
> budget)
>                 virtnet_xdp_put_sq(vi, sq);
>         }
>
> -       return received;
> +       return retry_refill ? budget : received;
>  }
>
>  static void virtnet_disable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index)
> @@ -3230,9 +3226,11 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>
>         for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>                 if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
> -                       /* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
> -                       if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> -                               schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> +                       /* If this fails, we will retry later in
> +                        * NAPI poll, which is scheduled in the below
> +                        * virtnet_enable_queue_pair
> +                        */
> +                       try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL);

Consider NAPI will be eventually scheduled, I wonder if it's still
worth to refill here.

>
>                 err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i);
>                 if (err < 0)
> @@ -3473,15 +3471,15 @@ static void __virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info 
> *vi,
>                                 bool refill)
>  {
>         bool running = netif_running(vi->dev);
> -       bool schedule_refill = false;
>
> -       if (refill && !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL))
> -               schedule_refill = true;
> +       if (refill)
> +               /* If this fails, we will retry later in NAPI poll, which is
> +                * scheduled in the below virtnet_napi_enable
> +                */
> +               try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);

and here.

> +
>         if (running)
>                 virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
> -
> -       if (schedule_refill)
> -               schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>  }
>
>  static void virtnet_rx_resume_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> @@ -3777,6 +3775,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, 
> u16 queue_pairs)
>         struct virtio_net_rss_config_trailer old_rss_trailer;
>         struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
>         struct scatterlist sg;
> +       int i;
>
>         if (!vi->has_cvq || !virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ))
>                 return 0;
> @@ -3829,11 +3828,17 @@ static int virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info 
> *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
>         }
>  succ:
>         vi->curr_queue_pairs = queue_pairs;
> -       /* virtnet_open() will refill when device is going to up. */
> -       spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
> -       if (dev->flags & IFF_UP && vi->refill_enabled)
> -               schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> -       spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
> +       if (dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
> +               /* Let the NAPI poll refill the receive buffer for us. We 
> can't
> +                * safely call try_fill_recv() here because the NAPI might be
> +                * enabled already.
> +                */
> +               local_bh_disable();
> +               for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++)
> +                       virtqueue_napi_schedule(&vi->rq[i].napi, 
> vi->rq[i].vq);
> +
> +               local_bh_enable();
> +       }
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.43.0
>

Thanks


Reply via email to