On 1/8/26 11:23, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> I'm also not sure why we're losing the scrutiny part?
>
> Something like:
>
> +If tools permit you to generate series entirely automatically, expect
> +additional scrutiny.
The reason I resisted integrating this is it tries to draw too specific
a line in the sand. Someone could rightfully read that and say they
don't expect additional scrutiny because the entire series was not
automatically generated.
What I want to say is: the more automation your tool provides, the more
scrutiny you get. Maybe:
Expect increasing amounts of maintainer scrutiny on
contributions that were increasingly generated by tooling.
