On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > > Improve the error handling in passive TFO test to check the return value > > from sendto(), and to fail if read() or fprintf() failed. > > You propose to adjust error detection and corresponding exception handling > another bit. > How do you think about to take also another look if further function > implementations > would be similarly affected?
Thank you for the suggestion. The first objective of this series is to fix the misleading behavior that was caused by the following bug. Therefore, I intentionally limited the scope of this patch to the affected or closely related functions. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/602c9e1ba5bb2ee1997bb38b1d866c9c3b807ae9.1767624906.git...@y-koj.net/ I believe this is sufficient to prevent it from showing misleading error messages when the test fails. Thank you, Yohei > > Regards, > Markus
