On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 9:34 AM Ihor Solodrai <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 1/28/26 7:35 AM, Chris Mason wrote: > > > > > > On 1/28/26 10:26 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c > >>> index 5a075e06cf..070ba80e39 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c > >>> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c > >>> @@ -4112,3 +4112,8 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_timed_may_goto(void) > >>> { > >>> return true; > >>> } > >>> + > >>> +bool bpf_jit_supports_fsession(void) > >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> This is the actual function name in the code. > > > > Ihor, I think the script parsing review-inline.txt chopped off the > > part of the review where AI was complaining about the commit message? > > This is the email body pre-processing in KPD, yes. > > At some point we decided to remove the commit message before sending > an email, but now that AI reviews the messages too, I think we should > just send the generated review-inline.txt as is. > > Alexei, wdyt?
I think KPD is only supposed to trim the header until 'diff ..' line. In this case there is no 'diff', so I'm not sure why it trimmed so much. commit sha... Author: ... are useless in email reply, so we should still trim them.
