On 2/25/26 08:15, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 03:59:08AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 05:40:02PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> > +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
>> > @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static inline __alloc_size(1, 2) void 
>> > *kmalloc_array_noprof(size_t n, size_t siz
>> >    size_t bytes;
>> >  
>> >    if (unlikely(check_mul_overflow(n, size, &bytes)))
>> > -          return NULL;
>> > +          bytes = SIZE_MAX;
>> >    return kmalloc_noprof(bytes, flags);
>> 
>> Wouldn't this be better written as:
>> 
>>      return kmalloc_noprof(size_mul(n, size), flags);
>> 
>> (etc)
> 
> Sure, I can convert them all that way if that's preferred?

Yeah I think it's better than effectively open-code the same thing?



Reply via email to