[...] >>> 3. Does the rcu_torture_ops structure need a ->call_hurry() field, >>> and if so, why? If not, why not? >>> >>> 4. Your additional questions here! >> >> Do we have a reproducer for the splat? If there is a link to the >> report, I could take a look and investigate. > > The splat is on an old kernel where rcutorture does not yet have > call_rcu_hurry(). So this patch isn't fixing a bug, but rather allegedly > improving lazy RCU rcutorture testing.
Makes sense! I take it that on a newer kernel, we do see a splat with just replacing _hurry() with the alternative, but without any other changes. But either way, this is a nice change, so thanks! -- Joel Fernandes
