> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index 178c4738e63b..565fe8cbcdc9 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -1156,6 +1156,20 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const
> union bpf_attr *kattr,
[ ... ]
> + } else {
> + /* For CONFIG_IPV6=n, ipv6_bpf_stub is NULL */
> + pr_warn_once("Please test this program with the IPv6
> module enabled\n");
Martin KaFai Lau's v9 review suggested pr_err_once here instead of
pr_warn_once. Since the function also returns -EOPNOTSUPP, should this
use pr_err_once to match the error severity?
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/22664502452
