On 3/5/26 03:18, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 09:17:37PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
On 3/3/26 19:21, Sasha Levin wrote:
Add CONFIG_KALLSYMS_LINEINFO, which embeds a compact address-to-line
lookup table in the kernel image so stack traces directly print source
file and line number information:
root@localhost:~# echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger
[ 11.201987] sysrq: Trigger a crash
[ 11.202831] Kernel panic - not syncing: sysrq triggered crash
[ 11.206218] Call Trace:
[ 11.206501] <TASK>
[ 11.206749] dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80 (lib/dump_stack.c:94)
[ 11.207403] vpanic+0x36e/0x620 (kernel/panic.c:650)
[ 11.208565] ? __lock_acquire+0x465/0x2240 (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4674)
[ 11.209324] panic+0xc9/0xd0 (kernel/panic.c:787)
[ 11.211873] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5350)
[ 11.212597] ? lock_release+0xd3/0x300 (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5535)
[ 11.213312] sysrq_handle_crash+0x1a/0x20 (drivers/tty/sysrq.c:154)
[ 11.214005] __handle_sysrq.cold+0x66/0x256 (drivers/tty/sysrq.c:611)
[ 11.214712] write_sysrq_trigger+0x65/0x80 (drivers/tty/sysrq.c:1221)
[ 11.215424] proc_reg_write+0x1bd/0x3c0 (fs/proc/inode.c:330)
[ 11.216061] vfs_write+0x1c6/0xff0 (fs/read_write.c:686)
[ 11.218848] ksys_write+0xfa/0x200 (fs/read_write.c:740)
[ 11.222394] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x690 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63)
[ 11.223942] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
(arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)
As mentioned in the other series, I really like this patch series.
I tested this series again on the parisc architecture, and the relative
directories are now stripped with this version of your patch.
IIRC, the previous patch did show the subdirectory names.
[ 132.840382] Backtrace:
[ 132.840382] [<104254d8>] show_stack+0x50/0x64 (traps.c:212)
[ 132.840382] [<1041c0c8>] dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0xa0 (dump_stack.c:122)
[ 132.840382] [<1041c118>] dump_stack+0x1c/0x2c (dump_stack.c:130)
[ 132.840382] [<10402218>] vpanic+0x154/0x344 (panic.c:550)
[ 132.840382] [<10402438>] panic+0x30/0x34 (panic.c:787)
[ 132.840382] [<10bebea8>] sysrq_handle_crash+0x30/0x34 (rcupdate.h:110)
[ 132.840382] [<10bec720>] __handle_sysrq+0xc0/0x1e4 (preempt.h:14)
Ugh... Can you confirm that you've build this kernel with O=?
Yes. Both -Os and -O2 do not show the relative path.
The RFC had a dirty dirty hack around how we turn these absolute paths into
relative ones, but I tried to re-do it so no one would yell at me :)
Seems it is needed...
Helge
