On 3/11/26 3:36 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 08:58:20AM -0700, Anthony Yznaga wrote:
Droppable mappings must not be lockable. There is a check for VMAs with
VM_DROPPABLE set in mlock_fixup() along with checks for other types of
unlockable VMAs which ensures this when calling mlock()/mlock2().

For mlockall(MCL_FUTURE), the check for unlockable VMAs is different.
In apply_mlockall_flags(), if the flags parameter has MCL_FUTURE set, the
current task's mm's default VMA flag field mm->def_flags has VM_LOCKED
applied to it. VM_LOCKONFAULT is also applied if MCL_ONFAULT is also set.
When these flags are set as default in this manner they are cleared in
__mmap_complete() for new mappings that do not support mlock. A check for
VM_DROPPABLE in __mmap_complete() is missing resulting in droppable
mappings created with VM_LOCKED set. To fix this and reduce that chance of
similar bugs in the future, introduce and use vma_supports_mlock().

Fixes: 9651fcedf7b9 ("mm: add MAP_DROPPABLE for designating always lazily freeable 
mappings")
We should definitely cc: stable I think.

It might result in some backport pain since it'll probably pre-date the
__mmap_region() stuff :)) sorry.

I could add a patch at the beginning that does the cheap fix followed by this patch.


Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Yznaga <[email protected]>
LGTM, so:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) <[email protected]>

---
v2:
  - Implement vma_supports_mlock() instead of vma flags mask (DavidH)
  - Add selftests (Lorenzo)
I know it's a sort of subject thing, but please in future add a cover letter if
#patches > 1 :) thanks!
Noted.

  include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h    |  2 +-
  mm/internal.h                     | 10 ++++++++++
  mm/mlock.c                        | 10 ++++++----
  mm/vma.c                          |  4 +---
  tools/testing/vma/include/stubs.h |  5 +++++
  5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h b/include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h
index 593f5d4e108b..755281fab23d 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static inline bool is_vma_hugetlb_flags(const vma_flags_t 
*flags)

  #endif

-static inline bool is_vm_hugetlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline bool is_vm_hugetlb_page(const struct vm_area_struct *vma)
  {
        return is_vm_hugetlb_flags(vma->vm_flags);
  }
Ideally we'd use the new VMA flags approach, but I'll fix that later myself when
I make those changes.

diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index cb0af847d7d9..8c67637abcdd 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -1218,6 +1218,16 @@ static inline struct file 
*maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(struct vm_fault *vmf,
        }
        return fpin;
  }
+
+static inline bool vma_supports_mlock(const struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+       if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_SPECIAL | VM_DROPPABLE))
+               return false;
+       if (vma_is_dax(vma) || is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
+               return false;
+       return vma != get_gate_vma(current->mm);
Honestly it's dumb that we don't have vma_is_gate(), I see arm32 have their own
is_gate_vma() macro, but we should really have one to avoid this noise :)

Anyway probably not worth it for this patch esp. if backporting.

But in this case no check at all is needed.

Anthony


Wonder if we should have vma_support_munlock() for secretmem ;) (again one for
another patch I guess).

+}
+
  #else /* !CONFIG_MMU */
  static inline void unmap_mapping_folio(struct folio *folio) { }
  static inline void mlock_new_folio(struct folio *folio) { }
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index 2f699c3497a5..73551c71cebf 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -472,10 +472,12 @@ static int mlock_fixup(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct 
vm_area_struct *vma,
        int ret = 0;
        vm_flags_t oldflags = vma->vm_flags;

-       if (newflags == oldflags || (oldflags & VM_SPECIAL) ||
-           is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) || vma == get_gate_vma(current->mm) ||
-           vma_is_dax(vma) || vma_is_secretmem(vma) || (oldflags & 
VM_DROPPABLE))
-               /* don't set VM_LOCKED or VM_LOCKONFAULT and don't count */
+       if (newflags == oldflags || vma_is_secretmem(vma) ||
+           !vma_supports_mlock(vma))
+               /*
+                * Don't set VM_LOCKED or VM_LOCKONFAULT and don't count.
+                * For secretmem, don't allow the memory to be unlocked.
+                */
                goto out;

        vma = vma_modify_flags(vmi, *prev, vma, start, end, &newflags);
diff --git a/mm/vma.c b/mm/vma.c
index be64f781a3aa..18c3c5280748 100644
--- a/mm/vma.c
+++ b/mm/vma.c
@@ -2589,9 +2589,7 @@ static void __mmap_complete(struct mmap_state *map, 
struct vm_area_struct *vma)

        vm_stat_account(mm, vma->vm_flags, map->pglen);
        if (vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
-               if ((vm_flags & VM_SPECIAL) || vma_is_dax(vma) ||
-                                       is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) ||
-                                       vma == get_gate_vma(mm))
+               if (!vma_supports_mlock(vma))
                        vm_flags_clear(vma, VM_LOCKED_MASK);
                else
                        mm->locked_vm += map->pglen;
diff --git a/tools/testing/vma/include/stubs.h 
b/tools/testing/vma/include/stubs.h
index 947a3a0c2566..416bb93f5005 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vma/include/stubs.h
+++ b/tools/testing/vma/include/stubs.h
@@ -426,3 +426,8 @@ static inline void vma_adjust_trans_huge(struct 
vm_area_struct *vma,
  }

  static inline void hugetlb_split(struct vm_area_struct *, unsigned long) {}
+
+static inline bool vma_supports_mlock(const struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+       return false;
+}
Thanks :) tested locally and working fine.

--
2.47.3

Cheers, Lorenzo

Reply via email to