On Wednesday, 6 of February 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 19:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, 6 of February 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 09:40 +0100, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > > > > On 06/02/2008, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, 5 of February 2008, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > > > > > > Rafael, any progress with this issue? (a few questions below). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does this artsmessage thing also run with RT priority? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, it's in a strange state (after it's broken). From top: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PR = -51 > > > > > > > NI = 0 > > > > > > > S = R > > > > > > > %CPU = 0.0 > > > > > > > %MEM = 0.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > cat /proc/$PID/stat ; sleep 3; cat /proc/$PID/stat ? > > > > > > cat /proc/sched_debug; sleep 3 ; cat /proc/sched_debug > > > > > > > > > > Well, instead please find appended a test program that allows me to > > > > > trigger > > > > > the issue. > > > > > > > > Great, I'll look at this problem in the everning (sure, if nobody else > > > > is faster :-). > > > > > > Yeah, it seems fixed here (after I made my current queue compile for > > > this silly CONFIG_USER_SCHED thing again). > > > > > > I'm now refusing realtime tasks in groups that do not have real-time > > > bandwidth assigned. > > > > If you're referring to this patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/4/332 , then > > sorry, but it doesn't fix the issue for me, with the attached config. > > Well, that whole queue.
It doesn't compile for me. > Your test program just failed to obtain realtime scheduling Well, it shouldn't. The expected result is to obtain realtime scheduling or we will break existing setups. > but didn't hang. That's much better outcome. :-) > I'll test your full config. OK, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/