On Mon, 2026-03-23 at 18:32 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2026-03-23 at 10:20 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > ring buffer. Since ring buffer entries are not zeroed on allocation, > > > > No behavioral change: since interface names are always at most 15 > > characters plus a NUL terminator, strscpy_pad() with size IFNAMSIZ (16) > > produces identical output to the original strncpy(). > > This doesn't add up - if it's not zero-filled on allocation, then it > *is* a (desired) behaviour change?
Err, no, never mind, it's str*n*cpy() now... johannes
