Eric_Terminal wrote on Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 12:27:50PM +0800: > Hi Simon and maintainers, > > Just a gentle ping on this patch series. > > Following up on my previous email regarding the testing methodology > (using virtme-ng, verifying the Oops fix in Patch 1, and confirming > the strictness of strsep + kstrtouint). > > Does the provided testing information address the concerns? Please let > me know if there's anything else I should clarify, or if a v3 is > needed to move this forward.
Part of the problem is that you've mixed a semi-complex 9p patch with other net patches, I think it'd be easiser to move forward if you'd split this (I can't take non-9p patches, and I'm not sure the -net tree wants the 9p patches as we're a small world appart sometimes...) For 9p, I can't (easily) test xen, so I'd appreciate if you could resend with Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]> in Ccs as he has been looking after this transport; I can have a quick look but don't have the time for a proper review Thanks, -- Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
