On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:50:59 -0700
"Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> On 3/23/2026 11:13 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Mar 2026 19:53:41 +0000
> > Smita Koralahalli <[email protected]> wrote:
> >   
> >> The current probe time ownership check for Soft Reserved memory based
> >> solely on CXL window intersection is insufficient. dax_hmem probing is not
> >> always guaranteed to run after CXL enumeration and region assembly, which
> >> can lead to incorrect ownership decisions before the CXL stack has
> >> finished publishing windows and assembling committed regions.
> >>
> >> Introduce deferred ownership handling for Soft Reserved ranges that
> >> intersect CXL windows. When such a range is encountered during the
> >> initial dax_hmem probe, schedule deferred work to wait for the CXL stack
> >> to complete enumeration and region assembly before deciding ownership.
> >>
> >> Once the deferred work runs, evaluate each Soft Reserved range
> >> individually: if a CXL region fully contains the range, skip it and let
> >> dax_cxl bind. Otherwise, register it with dax_hmem. This per-range
> >> ownership model avoids the need for CXL region teardown and
> >> alloc_dax_region() resource exclusion prevents double claiming.
> >>
> >> Introduce a boolean flag dax_hmem_initial_probe to live inside device.c
> >> so it survives module reload. Ensure dax_cxl defers driver registration
> >> until dax_hmem has completed ownership resolution. dax_cxl calls
> >> dax_hmem_flush_work() before cxl_driver_register(), which both waits for
> >> the deferred work to complete and creates a module symbol dependency that
> >> forces dax_hmem.ko to load before dax_cxl.
> >>
> >> Co-developed-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <[email protected]>  
> > 
> > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260322195343.206900-1-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa%40amd.com
> > Might be worth a look.  I think the last comment is potentially correct
> > though unlikely a platform_driver_register() actually fails.
> > 
> > I've not looked too closely at the others. Given this was doing something
> > unusual I thought I'd see what it found. Looks like some interesting
> > questions if nothing else.  
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out. I went through the findings:
> 
> The init error path one is valid I think, if 
> platform_driver_register(&dax_hmem_driver) fails after 
> dax_hmem_platform_driver has already probed and queued work, the error 
> path doesn't flush the work or release the pdev reference.
> 
> I was thinking something like below for v9:
> 
> @@ -258,8 +262,13 @@ static __init int dax_hmem_init(void)
>               return rc;
> 
>       rc = platform_driver_register(&dax_hmem_driver);
> -     if (rc)
> +     if (rc) {
> +             if (dax_hmem_work.pdev) {
> +                     flush_work(&dax_hmem_work.work);
> +                     put_device(&dax_hmem_work.pdev->dev);
> +             }
>               platform_driver_unregister(&dax_hmem_platform_driver);
> +     }
> 
>       return rc;
>   }
> 
> 
> Worth adding considering the unlikeliness?

I think so.  Alternative would be a very obvious comment to say we've
deliberately not handled this corner.  Code seems easier to me and
lines up with what remove is doing.


> 
> The others I looked at the IS_ENABLED vs IS_REACHABLE question is 
> something I'm discussing with Dan in 3/9 (there's a Kconfig dependency 
> and CXL_BUS dependency fix needed I guess), the module reload behavior 
> is intentional and others are mostly false positives I think..

I was more suspicious of those ones as can never remember exactly what
the effective rule are.

Thanks,

J
> 
> Thanks,
> Smita
> 
> >   
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/dax/bus.h         |  7 ++++
> >>   drivers/dax/cxl.c         |  1 +
> >>   drivers/dax/hmem/device.c |  3 ++
> >>   drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c   | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   4 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dax/bus.h b/drivers/dax/bus.h
> >> index cbbf64443098..ebbfe2d6da14 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dax/bus.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/dax/bus.h
> >> @@ -49,6 +49,13 @@ void dax_driver_unregister(struct dax_device_driver 
> >> *dax_drv);
> >>   void kill_dev_dax(struct dev_dax *dev_dax);
> >>   bool static_dev_dax(struct dev_dax *dev_dax);
> >>   
> >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_DAX_HMEM)
> >> +extern bool dax_hmem_initial_probe;
> >> +void dax_hmem_flush_work(void);
> >> +#else
> >> +static inline void dax_hmem_flush_work(void) { }
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >>   #define MODULE_ALIAS_DAX_DEVICE(type) \
> >>    MODULE_ALIAS("dax:t" __stringify(type) "*")
> >>   #define DAX_DEVICE_MODALIAS_FMT "dax:t%d"
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dax/cxl.c b/drivers/dax/cxl.c
> >> index a2136adfa186..3ab39b77843d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dax/cxl.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/dax/cxl.c
> >> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static struct cxl_driver cxl_dax_region_driver = {
> >>   
> >>   static void cxl_dax_region_driver_register(struct work_struct *work)
> >>   {
> >> +  dax_hmem_flush_work();
> >>    cxl_driver_register(&cxl_dax_region_driver);
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c b/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
> >> index 56e3cbd181b5..991a4bf7d969 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
> >> @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@
> >>   static bool nohmem;
> >>   module_param_named(disable, nohmem, bool, 0444);
> >>   
> >> +bool dax_hmem_initial_probe;
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_hmem_initial_probe);
> >> +
> >>   static bool platform_initialized;
> >>   static DEFINE_MUTEX(hmem_resource_lock);
> >>   static struct resource hmem_active = {
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c b/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
> >> index ca752db03201..9ceda6b5cadf 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
> >> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >>   #include <linux/memregion.h>
> >>   #include <linux/module.h>
> >>   #include <linux/dax.h>
> >> +#include <cxl/cxl.h>
> >>   #include "../bus.h"
> >>   
> >>   static bool region_idle;
> >> @@ -58,6 +59,23 @@ static void release_hmem(void *pdev)
> >>    platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> +struct dax_defer_work {
> >> +  struct platform_device *pdev;
> >> +  struct work_struct work;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static void process_defer_work(struct work_struct *w);
> >> +
> >> +static struct dax_defer_work dax_hmem_work = {
> >> +  .work = __WORK_INITIALIZER(dax_hmem_work.work, process_defer_work),
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +void dax_hmem_flush_work(void)
> >> +{
> >> +  flush_work(&dax_hmem_work.work);
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_hmem_flush_work);
> >> +
> >>   static int __hmem_register_device(struct device *host, int target_nid,
> >>                              const struct resource *res)
> >>   {
> >> @@ -122,6 +140,11 @@ static int hmem_register_device(struct device *host, 
> >> int target_nid,
> >>    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_DAX_CXL) &&
> >>        region_intersects(res->start, resource_size(res), IORESOURCE_MEM,
> >>                          IORES_DESC_CXL) != REGION_DISJOINT) {
> >> +          if (!dax_hmem_initial_probe) {
> >> +                  dev_dbg(host, "await CXL initial probe: %pr\n", res);
> >> +                  queue_work(system_long_wq, &dax_hmem_work.work);
> >> +                  return 0;
> >> +          }
> >>            dev_dbg(host, "deferring range to CXL: %pr\n", res);
> >>            return 0;
> >>    }
> >> @@ -129,8 +152,54 @@ static int hmem_register_device(struct device *host, 
> >> int target_nid,
> >>    return __hmem_register_device(host, target_nid, res);
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> +static int hmem_register_cxl_device(struct device *host, int target_nid,
> >> +                              const struct resource *res)
> >> +{
> >> +  if (region_intersects(res->start, resource_size(res), IORESOURCE_MEM,
> >> +                        IORES_DESC_CXL) == REGION_DISJOINT)
> >> +          return 0;
> >> +
> >> +  if (cxl_region_contains_resource((struct resource *)res)) {
> >> +          dev_dbg(host, "CXL claims resource, dropping: %pr\n", res);
> >> +          return 0;
> >> +  }
> >> +
> >> +  dev_dbg(host, "CXL did not claim resource, registering: %pr\n", res);
> >> +  return __hmem_register_device(host, target_nid, res);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void process_defer_work(struct work_struct *w)
> >> +{
> >> +  struct dax_defer_work *work = container_of(w, typeof(*work), work);
> >> +  struct platform_device *pdev;
> >> +
> >> +  if (!work->pdev)
> >> +          return;
> >> +
> >> +  pdev = work->pdev;
> >> +
> >> +  /* Relies on cxl_acpi and cxl_pci having had a chance to load */
> >> +  wait_for_device_probe();
> >> +
> >> +  guard(device)(&pdev->dev);
> >> +  if (!pdev->dev.driver)
> >> +          return;
> >> +
> >> +  if (!dax_hmem_initial_probe) {
> >> +          dax_hmem_initial_probe = true;
> >> +          walk_hmem_resources(&pdev->dev, hmem_register_cxl_device);
> >> +  }
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>   static int dax_hmem_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>   {
> >> +  if (work_pending(&dax_hmem_work.work))
> >> +          return -EBUSY;
> >> +
> >> +  if (!dax_hmem_work.pdev)
> >> +          dax_hmem_work.pdev =
> >> +                  to_platform_device(get_device(&pdev->dev));
> >> +
> >>    return walk_hmem_resources(&pdev->dev, hmem_register_device);
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> @@ -168,6 +237,11 @@ static __init int dax_hmem_init(void)
> >>   
> >>   static __exit void dax_hmem_exit(void)
> >>   {
> >> +  if (dax_hmem_work.pdev) {
> >> +          flush_work(&dax_hmem_work.work);
> >> +          put_device(&dax_hmem_work.pdev->dev);
> >> +  }
> >> +
> >>    platform_driver_unregister(&dax_hmem_driver);
> >>    platform_driver_unregister(&dax_hmem_platform_driver);
> >>   }  
> >   
> 
> 


Reply via email to