On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 11:04:43PM +0800, Leon Hwang wrote:
> uprobe programs are allowed to modify struct pt_regs.
> 
> Since the actual program type of uprobe is KPROBE, it can be abused to
> modify struct pt_regs via kprobe+freplace when the kprobe attaches to
> kernel functions.
> 
> For example,
> 
> SEC("?kprobe")
> int kprobe(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
>       return 0;
> }
> 
> SEC("?freplace")
> int freplace_kprobe(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
>       regs->di = 0;
>       return 0;
> }
> 
> freplace_kprobe prog will attach to kprobe prog.
> kprobe prog will attach to a kernel function.
> 
> Without this patch, when the kernel function runs, its first arg will
> always be set as 0 via the freplace_kprobe prog.
> 
> To avoid the abuse of kprobe_write_ctx=true via kprobe+freplace, disallow
> freplace on kprobe programs with mismatched kprobe_write_ctx values.
> 
> Fixes: 7384893d970e ("bpf: Allow uprobe program to change context registers")
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <[email protected]>

hi,
so it's another issue in addition to that on with tail-calls [1]
do you plan to resend this fix as well?

thanks,
jirka


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/

> ---
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 12330466d58b..f8257bae6081 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -6404,6 +6404,14 @@ static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env 
> *env, int insn_idx, int off,
>               /* remember the offset of last byte accessed in ctx */
>               if (env->prog->aux->max_ctx_offset < off + size)
>                       env->prog->aux->max_ctx_offset = off + size;
> +             if (env->prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
> +                     struct bpf_prog *dst_prog = env->prog->aux->dst_prog;
> +
> +                     if (env->prog->aux->kprobe_write_ctx != 
> dst_prog->aux->kprobe_write_ctx) {
> +                             verbose(env, "Extension program cannot have 
> different kprobe_write_ctx value with target prog\n");
> +                             return -EINVAL;
> +                     }
> +             }
>               return 0;
>       }
>  
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 

Reply via email to