On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 4:06 PM Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2026 14:29:20 +0800 Li Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Test all passed on: > > > x86_64(4k), aarch64(4K, 64K), ppc64le(64K). > > > > Hi Andrew, All, > > > > I see that Sashiko still points out minor issues in this patchset, > > That seems very tiny in selftest programming. > > > > I can correct all that in a new version if you'd like a perfect patchset. > > > > Sashiko comments: > > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260326032658.96819-1-liwang%40redhat.com > > Ah, OK, you already looked. > > If you say they're too minor then I'm OK with that. If there are any > you feel you'd like to address then go for it. That's my opinion, > others might differ! > > I suggest you leave things as-is for a while (a week?), give the memcg > maintainers time to take a look (please).
I think some of the comments are worth addressing, especially: Patch 4: Using BUF_SIZE in the allocation helpers is wrong, we should use the actual page size. Patch 6: Zero initialization of zw_allocation. But yeah as Andrew said, it may be worth waiting for memcg maintainers to take a look before sending a new version.
