Hi Rosen,

Thanks for your patch.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rosen Penev <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 1:23 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Michael Turquette <[email protected]>; Stephen Boyd 
> <[email protected]>; iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋
> □DITC○CPT) <[email protected]>; Kees Cook <[email protected]>; 
> Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <[email protected]>; moderated list:ARM/TOSHIBA VISCONTI ARCHITECTURE
> <[email protected]>; open list 
> <[email protected]>; open list:KERNEL HARDENING (not
> covered by other areas):Keyword:\b__counted_by(_le|_be)?\b 
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH] clk: visconti: pll: use kzalloc_flex
> 
> Simplify allocation by using a flexible array member and kzalloc_flex.
> 
> Add __counted_by for extra runtime analysis. Assign after allocation as 
> required by __counted_by.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro
> ---
>  drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c | 17 +++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c b/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c index 
> 6fd02c4b641e..ca29d12f9316 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c
> @@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ struct visconti_pll {
>       void __iomem    *pll_base;
>       spinlock_t      *lock;
>       unsigned long flags;
> -     const struct visconti_pll_rate_table *rate_table;
>       size_t rate_count;
>       struct visconti_pll_provider *ctx;
> +     struct visconti_pll_rate_table rate_table[] __counted_by(rate_count);
>  };
> 
>  #define PLL_CONF_REG         0x0000
> @@ -255,10 +255,6 @@ static struct clk_hw *visconti_register_pll(struct 
> visconti_pll_provider *ctx,
>       size_t len;
>       int ret;
> 
> -     pll = kzalloc_obj(*pll);
> -     if (!pll)
> -             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -
>       init.name = name;
>       init.flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED;
>       init.parent_names = &parent_name;
> @@ -266,11 +262,13 @@ static struct clk_hw *visconti_register_pll(struct 
> visconti_pll_provider *ctx,
> 
>       for (len = 0; rate_table[len].rate != 0; )
>               len++;
> +
> +     pll = kzalloc_flex(*pll, rate_table, len);
> +     if (!pll)
> +             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
>       pll->rate_count = len;
> -     pll->rate_table = kmemdup_array(rate_table,
> -                                     pll->rate_count, 
> sizeof(*pll->rate_table),
> -                                     GFP_KERNEL);
> -     WARN(!pll->rate_table, "%s: could not allocate rate table for %s\n", 
> __func__, name);
> +     memcpy(pll->rate_table, rate_table, len * sizeof(*pll->rate_table));
> 
>       init.ops = &visconti_pll_ops;
>       pll->hw.init = &init;
> @@ -282,7 +280,6 @@ static struct clk_hw *visconti_register_pll(struct 
> visconti_pll_provider *ctx,
>       ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &pll->hw);
>       if (ret) {
>               pr_err("failed to register pll clock %s : %d\n", name, ret);
> -             kfree(pll->rate_table);
>               kfree(pll);
>               pll_hw_clk = ERR_PTR(ret);
>       }
> --
> 2.53.0



Reply via email to