On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 21:49:45 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> @@ -873,6 +881,16 @@ attribute-sets:
>          doc: Unique devlink instance index.
>          checks:
>            max: u32-max
> +      -
> +        name: resource-scope-mask
> +        type: bitfield32

no need for a bitfield here, this is a simpler selector
bitfield is for cases when we need to update some persistent
state, in that case we want to indicate which bits we intend
to update:

        cfg = (cfg & ~bf.mask) | bf.val

scope is a straight attribute, there's no updating of anything.

u32 or unit would do

> +        enum: resource-scope
> +        enum-as-flags: true
> +        doc: |
> +          Bitmask selecting which resource classes to include in a
> +          resource-dump response. Bit 0 (dev) selects device-level
> +          resources; bit 1 (port) selects port-level resources.
> +          When absent all classes are returned.
>    -
>      name: dl-dev-stats
>      subset-of: devlink
> @@ -1775,7 +1793,11 @@ operations:
>              - resource-list
>        dump:
>          request:
> -          attributes: *dev-id-attrs
> +          attributes:
> +            - bus-name
> +            - dev-name
> +            - index
> +            - resource-scope-mask
>          reply: *resource-dump-reply
>  
>      -
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> index 7de2d8cc862f..e0a0b523ce5c 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> @@ -645,6 +645,7 @@ enum devlink_attr {
>       DEVLINK_ATTR_PARAM_RESET_DEFAULT,       /* flag */
>  
>       DEVLINK_ATTR_INDEX,                     /* uint */
> +     DEVLINK_ATTR_RESOURCE_SCOPE_MASK,       /* bitfield32 */
>  
>       /* Add new attributes above here, update the spec in
>        * Documentation/netlink/specs/devlink.yaml and re-generate
> @@ -704,6 +705,22 @@ enum devlink_resource_unit {
>       DEVLINK_RESOURCE_UNIT_ENTRY,
>  };
>  
> +enum devlink_resource_scope {
> +     DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_DEV_BIT,
> +     DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_PORT_BIT,
> +
> +     __DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_MAX_BIT,
> +     DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_MAX_BIT =

do we need this? it's not an attr enum all we care about here is 
the mask, really so just a trailing value which is max real value + 1
is enough for all users?

> +             __DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_MAX_BIT - 1
> +};
> +
> +#define DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_DEV \
> +     _BITUL(DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_DEV_BIT)
> +#define DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_PORT \
> +     _BITUL(DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_PORT_BIT)
> +#define DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_VALID_MASK \
> +     (_BITUL(__DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_MAX_BIT) - 1)
> +
>  enum devlink_port_fn_attr_cap {
>       DEVLINK_PORT_FN_ATTR_CAP_ROCE_BIT,
>       DEVLINK_PORT_FN_ATTR_CAP_MIGRATABLE_BIT,

> +static u32 devlink_resource_scope_get(struct nlattr **attrs, int *flags)
> +{
> +     struct nla_bitfield32 scope;
> +     u32 value;
> +
> +     if (!attrs || !attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RESOURCE_SCOPE_MASK])
> +             return DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_VALID_MASK;
> +
> +     scope = nla_get_bitfield32(attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RESOURCE_SCOPE_MASK]);
> +     value = scope.value & scope.selector;
> +     if (value != DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_VALID_MASK)
> +             *flags |= NLM_F_DUMP_FILTERED;
> +
> +     return value;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  devlink_resource_dump_fill_one(struct sk_buff *skb, struct devlink *devlink,
>                              struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
> @@ -400,16 +416,27 @@ devlink_nl_resource_dump_one(struct sk_buff *skb, 
> struct devlink *devlink,
>       struct devlink_nl_dump_state *state = devlink_dump_state(cb);
>       struct devlink_port *devlink_port;
>       unsigned long port_idx;
> +     u32 scope;
>       int err;
>  
> -     if (!state->port_number) {
> +     scope = devlink_resource_scope_get(genl_info_dump(cb)->attrs, &flags);
> +     if (!scope) {
> +             NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(genl_info_dump(cb)->extack,
> +                                 
> genl_info_dump(cb)->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RESOURCE_SCOPE_MASK],

we have genl_info_dump(cb) 3 times here, let's save the pointer 
on the stack to make the lines shorter.

> +                                 "empty resource scope selection");
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +     if (!state->port_number && (scope & DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_DEV)) {
>               err = devlink_resource_dump_fill_one(skb, devlink, NULL,
> -                                                  cb, flags, &state->idx);
> +                                                  cb, flags,
> +                                                  &state->idx);
>               if (err)
>                       return err;
>               state->idx = 0;
>       }
>  
> +     if (!(scope & DEVLINK_RESOURCE_SCOPE_PORT))
> +             goto out;
>       xa_for_each_start(&devlink->ports, port_idx, devlink_port,
>                         state->port_number ? state->port_number - 1 : 0) {
>               err = devlink_resource_dump_fill_one(skb, devlink, devlink_port,
> @@ -420,6 +447,7 @@ devlink_nl_resource_dump_one(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> devlink *devlink,
>               }
>               state->idx = 0;
>       }
> +out:
>       state->port_number = 0;
>       return 0;
>  }


Reply via email to