> Did you test without CONFIG_PARAVIRT, and CONFIG_PARAVIRT booted both with and
> without the "noreplace-paravirt" parameter?

I did not test CONFIG_PARAVIRT at all.  I just fixed what its introduction
had done to break generic x86-64.


Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to