On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 11:50:03 -0700 Yosry Ahmed <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> Preferences? > > >> > > >> Reply-to-author would likely be better as a first step. > > > > > > Why do you think so? > > > > The most important part for me is that authors are aware of the reports. > > > > Sending them as a mail forces people to publicly reply to the feedback, and > > at > > this point in time, I am not convinced that that is the right approach. > > But I imagine it's useful for reviewers to see Sashiko's feedback as > well (without having to go look on the website). It's possible that > Sashiko is right but the author isn't convinced, so getting more eyes > on the feedback would help. If Sashiko is wrong, it's still useful for > more people to see it and point it out, instead of Sashiko privately > misguiding the author, especially that reviewers are probably more > likely to tell if Sashiko is right or wrong. Also, Sashiko does like to find unrelated bugs in surrounding code. I saw two of these today. But whatever, one step at a time. My main interest at present is to stop having to send lame emails linking to the Sashiko reports!
