On Mon, 04 May 2026 17:27:49 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > + if (bind_dev != netdev) > + netdev_lock(bind_dev); > + dma_dev = netdev_queue_get_dma_dev(bind_dev, 0, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX); > + if (bind_dev != netdev) > + netdev_unlock(bind_dev); > + binding = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(bind_dev, > + bind_dev != netdev ? netdev : NULL, > + dma_dev, DMA_TO_DEVICE, dmabuf_fd, > + priv, info->extack);
Not sure if it matters but are we intentionally releasing the bind_dev lock before calling net_devmem_bind_dmabuf() ? Previously more code here was covered by the physical netdev's lock.
