On 5/8/26 12:00 PM, Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay wrote:
> This patch series adds support for the Analog Devices AD9910 DDS.
> This is a RFC so that we can agree/discuss on the design that follows:
>
> This is a follow-up of the V3 discussion. For V1, we reached into
> this channel composition agreement where physical channels may have
> sub-channels. That adds the flexibility necessary for this design.
> During V2, some feedback indicated that the ABI is too device-specific,
> so DRG/RAM destination and operating modes are configured through
> alternate paths and profile channels are created. In V3, there was
> further discussion on the ABI and on mode priority debug.
>
What happened with the idea of adding a new attribute to show the
relationship of the sub-channels to the actual physical output
channels?
