> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> index 59855b434f0b..804c201c28f3 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index f3cf8d85bea0..35eebb5e7769 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -11671,7 +11674,8 @@ static bool check_kfunc_is_graph_node_api(struct
> bpf_verifier_env *env,
>
> switch (node_field_type) {
> case BPF_LIST_NODE:
> - ret = is_bpf_list_push_kfunc(kfunc_btf_id);
> + ret = is_bpf_list_push_kfunc(kfunc_btf_id) ||
> + kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_del];
This isn't a bug, but Eduard Zingerman suggested in v10 adding a
is_bpf_list_del_kfunc() helper for consistency with the existing code style
(similar to is_bpf_list_push_kfunc()). This would maintain the pattern used
throughout the codebase for checking kfunc types.
Reference:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/26204125015
