On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 09:34:46PM -0400, Guodong Xu wrote:
> Commit 30c3099036a9 ("riscv/hwprobe: add zicfilp / zicfiss
> enumeration in hwprobe") added RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICFISS as bit 0 of
> RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_1 but did not add a matching entry to
> Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst. Add it now.
We also need to document RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICFILP
>
> Fixes: 30c3099036a9 ("riscv/hwprobe: add zicfilp / zicfiss enumeration in
> hwprobe")
> Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2: New patch.
> ---
> Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> index c420a8349bc68..b1a84ac06da75 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> @@ -391,3 +391,7 @@ The following keys are defined:
> * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_1`: A bitmask containing additional
> extensions that are compatible with the
> :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA`: base system behavior.
> +
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICFISS`: The Zicfiss extension is supported,
> + as defined in version 1.0 of the RISC-V Control-flow Integrity (CFI)
> + extensions specification, ratified 2024-07.
We have a variety of indentation in this file. Sometimes we align under
'm' as done here, sometimes under the first ':' and sometimes the second.
Not a huge deal, but maybe before documenting more extensions we should
have a patch that makes all the indentation consistent first.
Thanks,
drew
