On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 01:36:48PM +0000, Antony Kurniawan Soemardi wrote: > On 6/1/2026 6:38 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 03:51:17PM +0700, Antony Kurniawan Soemardi via B4 > > Relay wrote: > > > From: Antony Kurniawan Soemardi <[email protected]> > > > > > > Add support for the "qcom,rpmcc-msm8960" compatible string to the > > > RPM clock driver. > > > > > > msm8960 uses the same RPM clock descriptions as apq8064, so reuse > > > rpm_clk_apq8064 for this compatible. > > > > > > Tested-by: Rudraksha Gupta <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Antony Kurniawan Soemardi <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > On the other hand... You have added APQ8064 strings as a fallback. Is > > this change really needed until you actually have SoC-specific quirks? > > The fallback was recommended by Konrad in the initial review: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > As for SoC specific quirks, I don't have anything planned right now about it > though...
So, I think, this patch can be dropped. The entry for APQ8064 should work already. -- With best wishes Dmitry
