On 06-07 20:59, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On 2026-06-07 16:20:50+00:00, Pasha Tatashin wrote: > > On 06-07 14:58, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 05 Jun 2026 03:32:27 +0000, Pasha Tatashin > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > It's radix tree data structure implementation, kho memory tracker is it's > > > user. Please rephrase to keep the semantics clear. > > > > Yeap, I will update it. > > > > > I don't see much value in moving kexec_handover.o to a separate line, > > > btw, the same is true for luo_core.o, but it's not important enough to > > > change. > > > > This is purely for consistency. I wanted to use the exact same style in > > the Makefile instead of having two different ways of declaring the > > object lists. > > > > This: > > luo-y := \ > > luo_core.o \ > > luo_file.o \ > > luo_flb.o \ > > luo_session.o > > > > kho-y := \ > > kexec_handover.o \ > > kho_radix.o \ > > kho_block.o \ > > kho_vmalloc.o > > I mean this: > > luo-y := luo_core.o \ > luo_file.o \ > luo_flb.o \ > luo_session.o > > kho-y := kexec_handover.o \ > kho_radix.o \ > kho_block.o \ > kho_vmalloc.o
Got it, I thought you were against making the consistent :-) > >
