On 6/9/26 2:44 PM, André Draszik wrote:
> Hi Tudor,
>
Hi!
> On Wed, 2026-06-03 at 13:00 +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi
>> index 86933f22647b..b6866ef99fb3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> @@ -639,6 +647,15 @@ watchdog_cl1: watchdog@10070000 {
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>>
>> + tmu_top: thermal-sensor@100a0000 {
>> + compatible = "google,gs101-tmu-top";
>> + reg = <0x100a0000 0x800>;
>> + clocks = <&cmu_misc CLK_GOUT_MISC_TMU_TOP_PCLK>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 769 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
>> + samsung,acpm-ipc = <&acpm_ipc>;
>> + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
>
> Vendor-specific properties should always come after generic ones
> (samsung,... to move to end here).
Yes, thanks! I'll address this after I get some feedback on the driver
from the thermal maintainers.
Cheers,
ta
