On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 10:10 AM Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 6:09 AM Jiayuan Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > All fixes are from previous patches sent by Weiming Shi, Zhang Cen, > > Kuniyuki and Sechang Lim, which have already been reviewed by me and John > > and Jakub. > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ > > > > The automated reviewer (sashiko) may still flag a few other potential > > issues on top of this series. After looking into them, they are either > > already covered by the patches here, or only reachable under very narrow > > conditions that require a specially crafted BPF program and an unusual > > sk_msg ring state, so they are not practical to trigger and are left out > > of this series. I'm collecting these fixes together because the same > > problems have been re-sent many times in slightly different forms, and I > > hope this series can be prioritized for merging so the duplicates can > > finally settle. With so many AI-generated patches floating around for > > these spots, leaving them unmerged just keeps wasting maintainer review > > cycles on the same issues. > > > > > > v2->v3: Target to bpf-next and carry Emil's reviewed-by tag. > > Reverse xmas tree style is used suggested by Cong. > > (not all code match reverse xmas tree due to variable dependency) > > v1->v2: fix problem when fix the conflict. > > > > Kuniyuki, > > one patch is yours. thanks. > Please help review the rest.
Sure, will look into it. Thanks
