On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 13:58 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > It's in mainline 84ac86ca8c6787f9efff28bc04b1b65fe0a5c310
> > [SCSI] arm: convert to accessors and !use_sg cleanup
> >
> > Thanks for checking. This patch was in scsi-pending tree since forever, And
> > we were unable
> > to get a responsive maintainer to ACK on them. until the breakage cause
> > went into mainline
> > we finally managed a Tested-by:.
> >
> > I guess sometimes people are so busy, you need a bulldozer to shove 20
> > minutes into they're
> > schedule.
>
> Oh, I was ill for most of December, particularly at the time that you
> sent the patch, and by the time I recovered, it was buried in my mailbox.
>
> Suggest you have some consideration for others who might not be able to
> do your beg and call at the immediate moment that you want it, and
> consider that their email management skills may not be as l33t as yours.
OK, sorry about this, it's a bit of a cockup all around. The patch that
fixes this problem is still in SCSI pending largely because it's patch
description:
[SCSI] fas216: Use scsi_eh API for REQUEST_SENSE invocation
Doesn't lead one to think it might be build critical, so I concentrated
on getting the other arm patch out.
Russell, could you give it a quick test, and I'll put it in with a
tested-by tag?
Thanks,
James
---
From: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:39:11 +0300
Subject: [SCSI] fas216: Use scsi_eh API for REQUEST_SENSE invocation
- Use new scsi_eh_prep/restor_cmnd() for synchronous
REQUEST_SENSE invocation.
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c | 16 +++-------------
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c b/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c
index fb5f202..a715632 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c
@@ -2018,6 +2018,7 @@ static void fas216_rq_sns_done(FAS216_Info *info, struct
scsi_cmnd *SCpnt,
* the upper layers to process. This would have been set
* correctly by fas216_std_done.
*/
+ scsi_eh_restore_cmnd(SCpnt, &info->ses);
SCpnt->scsi_done(SCpnt);
}
@@ -2103,23 +2104,12 @@ request_sense:
if (SCpnt->cmnd[0] == REQUEST_SENSE)
goto done;
+ scsi_eh_prep_cmnd(SCpnt, &info->ses, NULL, 0, ~0);
fas216_log_target(info, LOG_CONNECT, SCpnt->device->id,
"requesting sense");
- memset(SCpnt->cmnd, 0, sizeof (SCpnt->cmnd));
- SCpnt->cmnd[0] = REQUEST_SENSE;
- SCpnt->cmnd[1] = SCpnt->device->lun << 5;
- SCpnt->cmnd[4] = sizeof(SCpnt->sense_buffer);
- SCpnt->cmd_len = COMMAND_SIZE(SCpnt->cmnd[0]);
- SCpnt->SCp.buffer = NULL;
- SCpnt->SCp.buffers_residual = 0;
- SCpnt->SCp.ptr = (char *)SCpnt->sense_buffer;
- SCpnt->SCp.this_residual = sizeof(SCpnt->sense_buffer);
- SCpnt->SCp.phase = sizeof(SCpnt->sense_buffer);
+ init_SCp(SCpnt);
SCpnt->SCp.Message = 0;
SCpnt->SCp.Status = 0;
- SCpnt->request_bufflen = sizeof(SCpnt->sense_buffer);
- SCpnt->sc_data_direction = DMA_FROM_DEVICE;
- SCpnt->use_sg = 0;
SCpnt->tag = 0;
SCpnt->host_scribble = (void *)fas216_rq_sns_done;
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.h b/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.h
index 00e5f05..3e73e26 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.h
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
#define NO_IRQ 255
#endif
+#include <scsi/scsi_eh.h>
+
#include "queue.h"
#include "msgqueue.h"
@@ -311,6 +313,7 @@ typedef struct {
/* miscellaneous */
int internal_done; /* flag to indicate
request done */
+ struct scsi_eh_save *ses; /* holds request sense restore
info */
unsigned long magic_end;
} FAS216_Info;
--
1.5.3.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
