On Feb 10, 2008 8:36 AM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> + } else if ((count == 8) && (((long)mem & 7) == 0)) {
> + u64 tmp_ll;
> + if (probe_kernel_address(mem, tmp_ll))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + mem += 8;
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 60) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 56) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 52) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 48) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 44) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 40) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 36) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 32) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 28) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 24) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 20) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 16) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 12) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 8) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 4) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[tmp_ll & 0xf];
> +#else
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 4) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[tmp_ll & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 12) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 8) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 20) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 16) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 28) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 24) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 36) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 32) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 44) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 40) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 52) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 48) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 60) & 0xf];
> + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_ll >> 56) & 0xf];
> +#endif
Am I missing something? (I'm due, so it's not really a rhetorical
question :-) .) Wouldn't
unsigned int void u64_to_hex(u64 val, unsigned char *buf)
{
int i;
for (i=15; i>=0; i--) {
buf[i] = hexchars[ val & 0x0f ];
val >>= 4;
}
return 16;
}
...
buf += u64_to_hex(cpu_to_be64(tmp_ll), buf);
be clearer both visually, and code-as-intent? (And equivalent helpers
for u32, u16 -- though they could all be rolled into one.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
