>On 6/17/26 19:03, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 6/17/26 17:57, Rafael Passos wrote: >>> This link in the docs point to a wiki that is no longer active. >>> >>> The wiki was moved to archive.kernel.org, and there is a warning: >>> "OBSOLETE CONTENT This wiki has been archived and the content is >>> no longer updated." >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rafael Passos <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> >>> Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst | 5 ----- >>> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst >>> b/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst >>> index d7bfe320338c..64c0ec7428a2 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst >>> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst >>> @@ -15,11 +15,6 @@ able to run that test on an older kernel. Hence, it is >>> important to keep >>> code that can still test an older kernel and make sure it skips the test >>> gracefully on newer releases. >>> -You can find additional information on Kselftest framework, how to >>> -write new tests using the framework on Kselftest wiki: >>> - >>> -https://kselftest.wiki.kernel.org/ >>> - >>> On some systems, hot-plug tests could hang forever waiting for cpu and >>> memory to be ready to be offlined. A special hot-plug target is created >>> to run the full range of hot-plug tests. In default mode, hot-plug tests >>> run >> >> >> Looks good to me. >> >> Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]> > >Jon, > >I can take this through kselftest tree as I usually do. > >thanks, >-- Shuah
Hi Shuah, Jon et al, I've been trying to get the same change merged since August 2025: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/[email protected]/ resent in January: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/[email protected]/ It's great that this trivial fix is finally getting merged, but can someone explain why this patch was accepted in preference to the one I sent in August? Brett Sheffield (he/him)
