On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 03:30:57PM -0700, Eduard Zingerman wrote: > This paragraph is completely unnecessary. > > I don't think the fixes tag applies to the test. > > Why is this test necessary? Does it exercise any paths that the > previous one does not check?
Thanks, all addressed in v4. I removed the paragraph, dropped the Fixes tag from the selftest patch, and removed the rbtree test. The list-node case exercises the same refcount-acquire fixed-offset rejection path, so the rbtree variant is redundant for this regression coverage. Yiyang
