On 6/30/26 15:47, Xiang Mei wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 3:14 PM H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2026-06-30 15:05, Dave Hansen wrote: >>> On 6/30/26 15:02, Xiang Mei wrote: >>>> Please feel free to ask any questions; I am glad to help. >>> How do the CET features: kernel IBT and the (theoretical for Linux) >>> kernel shadow stacks impact the situation? >> CET should prevent this from being the target of a JOP attack. >> > You are right; CET breaks the assumption that this technique needs a > CFH primitive.
I'm not sure what you're saying. Are you saying that this ENTER-based technique is worthless if IBT is in play, so the new stack gap is a worthless mitigation too?
