On 1/7/26 09:26, Tiezhu Yang wrote: [...] > > Hi all, > > Alexei said in another thread like this: > > ``` >> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260615025316.24429-1- > [email protected]/ > > I don't think we need such fallback in patch [3]. > ``` > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ > > Should I just drop my previous patch? To be honest, I'm not sure how to > solve the issue mentioned in it. Is that a real problem, and does it > need to be fixed? What is the next step? >
It is a real issue. Instead of fixing up helper calls, it seems better to prevent interpreter fallback if the prog has any JIT-inlineable helper call. Thanks, Leon
