On 7/3/26 18:32, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 02:12:40PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 09:05:58AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: >> >> I personally think 1-2 are the only relevant cases. >> >>> >>> Yes, I raised something similar as reply to Christian's RFC [1], where I >>> said >>> that for me the information *how* it was used is much more important: >>> >>> " >>> Assisted-by: LLM # translate commit message >>> Assisted-by: LLM # generate some test cases >>> Assisted-by: LLM # cleanup logic >>> Assisted-by: LLM # everything and I have no clue what any in here does >>> " >> >> Yup, and we don't need complicated rules for that just 'document what you >> used >> it for and give a sense of how much'. >> >> It's fuzzy but useful. >> >>> >>> That tag is it stands is pretty useless, really. >> >> Not to go over it all again but I disagree, even as it stands, it allows us >> to >> engage in conversation about the LLM usage if admitted, and to point those >> who >> are misbehaving at the rules if not. >> >> And it is a clear way to get the boolean 'is this person saying they used an >> LLM'. >> >> But I agree with you it'd be MUCH more useful if we did the above. >> >> I wonder if we could get consensus on adding a section to the doc saying that >> it'd be _useful_ to add a comment explaining _what_ you did, and explaining >> the >> concept with some examples? > > I'd support a patch that replaces > > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-3-opus coccinelle sparse > > with > > Assisted-by: LLM # generate some test cases > > and rewrites the Attribution section of > Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst accordingly. > > I think most people in this mail thread have expressed that how > generative AI was used is the most important information, and several > people (including myself) have expressed a desire to stop the free > advertising. Unless I missed something, I don't think anyone has > expressed an interest in keeping the agent name and model.
Yes, that's something I would enjoy seeing. Who reading along has a problem with that? (assuming that the tag must stay) -- Cheers, David
