On 06.07.26 08:09, lirongqing wrote:
> From: Li RongQing <[email protected]>
> 
> In alloc_inout(), the qpc field offset was computed using
> MLX5_ADDR_OF(rst2init_qp_in, ...) in both the INIT2RTR_QP and
> RTR2RTS_QP cases. This is a copy-paste error: each case should use
> its own input structure type to get the correct qpc offset.
> 
> Fix the INIT2RTR_QP case to use MLX5_ADDR_OF(init2rtr_qp_in, ...)
> and the RTR2RTS_QP case to use MLX5_ADDR_OF(rtr2rts_qp_in, ...).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c 
> b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> index ad0d5fbb..eb431a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> @@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ static void alloc_inout(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev, int 
> cmd, void **in, int *inl
>               MLX5_SET(init2rtr_qp_in, *in, opcode, cmd);
>               MLX5_SET(init2rtr_qp_in, *in, uid, ndev->mvdev.res.uid);
>               MLX5_SET(init2rtr_qp_in, *in, qpn, qpn);
> -             qpc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(rst2init_qp_in, *in, qpc);
> +             qpc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(init2rtr_qp_in, *in, qpc);
>               MLX5_SET(qpc, qpc, mtu, MLX5_QPC_MTU_256_BYTES);
>               MLX5_SET(qpc, qpc, log_msg_max, 30);
>               MLX5_SET(qpc, qpc, remote_qpn, rqpn);
> @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ static void alloc_inout(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev, int 
> cmd, void **in, int *inl
>               MLX5_SET(rtr2rts_qp_in, *in, opcode, cmd);
>               MLX5_SET(rtr2rts_qp_in, *in, uid, ndev->mvdev.res.uid);
>               MLX5_SET(rtr2rts_qp_in, *in, qpn, qpn);
> -             qpc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(rst2init_qp_in, *in, qpc);
> +             qpc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(rtr2rts_qp_in, *in, qpc);
>               pp = MLX5_ADDR_OF(qpc, qpc, primary_address_path);
>               MLX5_SET(ads, pp, ack_timeout, 14);
>               MLX5_SET(qpc, qpc, retry_count, 7);

Thanks for the catch. Luckily those structs have the same layout.

Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Dragos

Reply via email to