On 12/07/2026 05:09, Deep Shah wrote:
ptp_clock_adjtime() validates an ADJ_FREQUENCY request by converting
tx->freq to ppb and comparing it against ops->max_adj. On 64-bit systems
that conversion can overflow s64 and wrap the result back into range, so
a crafted tx->freq bypasses the check and reaches ->adjfine() unclamped.

Patch 1 rejects the overflow in ptp_clock_adjtime().
Patch 2 adds a regression test that crafts struct timex.freq directly
(testptp's int-ppb path cannot express the value) and confirms it is
rejected with -ERANGE.

Deep Shah (2):
   ptp: reject frequency adjustments that overflow scaled_ppm_to_ppb()
   selftests: ptp: add a regression test for the frequency adjustment
     overflow

  drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c                       | 14 +++-
  tools/testing/selftests/ptp/Makefile          |  2 +-
  .../testing/selftests/ptp/ptp_freq_overflow.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ptp/ptp_freq_overflow.c


base-commit: 3f1f755366687d051174739fb99f7d560202f60b

For the series:
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>

Reply via email to