On Fri Jul 10, 2026 at 3:51 PM CEST, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Bartosz Golaszewski (5):
>       kunit: provide a set of fwnode-oriented helpers
>       software node: add fw_devlink support
>       software node: add kunit tests for fw_devlink support
>       MAINTAINERS: add myself as reviewer of software node support
>       gpio: kunit: add test cases verifying swnode devlink support

Overall looks good, but I think the two issues pointed out by Sashiko are valid.
In addition, I also found a memory leak in the gpiolib kunit test:

        unreferenced object 0xffff88810296b2c0 (size 32):
          comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1096, jiffies 4294694235
          hex dump (first 32 bytes):
            00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
            66 6f 6f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  foo.............
          backtrace (crc a62f59c2):
            __kmalloc_noprof+0x216/0x510
            desc_set_label+0x46/0xc0
            gpiod_request_commit+0xd5/0x140
            gpiod_request+0x49/0x170
            gpiod_find_and_request+0x2be/0x520
            gpiod_get_index+0x56/0x70
            devm_gpiod_get+0x1b/0x90
            0xffffffffc0401ff8
            platform_probe+0x58/0x90
            really_probe+0x1bc/0x490
            __driver_probe_device+0xa2/0x140
            driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x110
            __device_attach_driver+0xc2/0x140
            bus_for_each_drv+0x117/0x170
            __device_attach+0xd5/0x1c0
            device_initial_probe+0x34/0x50

I came up with the following diff to resolve those issues.

diff --git a/drivers/base/test/swnode-devlink-test.c 
b/drivers/base/test/swnode-devlink-test.c
index 6f59f13214fc..143b9c4047a0 100644
--- a/drivers/base/test/swnode-devlink-test.c
+++ b/drivers/base/test/swnode-devlink-test.c
@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
 #include <kunit/platform_device.h>
 #include <kunit/test.h>

+KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(device_remove_software_node_wrapper,
+                           device_remove_software_node,
+                           struct device *);
+
 static int swnode_count_suppliers(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
 {
        struct fwnode_link *link;
@@ -294,6 +298,9 @@ static void swnode_devlink_test_probe_order(struct kunit 
*test)

        ret = device_add_software_node(&supplier->dev, &supplier_swnode);
        KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+       ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, 
device_remove_software_node_wrapper,
+                                       &supplier->dev);
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
        ret = device_create_managed_software_node(&consumer->dev,
                                                  consumer_props, NULL);
        KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
@@ -313,8 +320,6 @@ static void swnode_devlink_test_probe_order(struct kunit 
*test)

        /* Tear down the consumer (and its device link) before the supplier. */
        kunit_platform_device_unregister(test, consumer);
-
-       device_remove_software_node(&supplier->dev);
 }

 static struct kunit_case swnode_test_cases[] = {
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c
index ad961cf97aee..7798f8a8e602 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c
@@ -449,6 +449,9 @@ static void gpio_swnode_probe_defer_on_unregistered(struct 
kunit *test)

        pdata = dev_get_platdata(&cons->dev);
        KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, pdata->gpio_err, 0);
+
+       /* Tear down the consumer before the provider to free the GPIO. */
+       kunit_platform_device_unregister(test, cons);
 }

 static int gpio_swnode_probe_order_test_init(struct kunit *test)
@@ -614,9 +617,17 @@ static struct kunit_case 
gpio_unbind_with_consumers_tests[] = {
        { }
 };

+static int gpio_unbind_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       device_link_wait_removal();
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
 static struct kunit_suite gpio_unbind_with_consumers_test_suite = {
        .name = "gpio-unbind-with-consumers",
        .test_cases = gpio_unbind_with_consumers_tests,
+       .init = gpio_unbind_test_init,
 };

 kunit_test_suites(

Reply via email to