There are many adjacent blank lines in the verifier that have accumulated over time.
Drop them for cleanup. No functional changes intended. Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <[email protected]> --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 03e2202cca13..b5666a75a273 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -655,7 +655,6 @@ static void __mark_dynptr_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, enum bpf_dynptr_type type, bool first_slot, int id, int parent_id); - static void mark_dynptr_stack_regs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *sreg1, struct bpf_reg_state *sreg2, @@ -1692,7 +1691,6 @@ static bool same_callsites(struct bpf_verifier_state *a, struct bpf_verifier_sta return true; } - void bpf_free_backedges(struct bpf_scc_visit *visit) { struct bpf_scc_backedge *backedge, *next; @@ -2312,7 +2310,6 @@ static struct bpf_verifier_state *push_async_cb(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return &elem->st; } - static int cmp_subprogs(const void *a, const void *b) { return ((struct bpf_subprog_info *)a)->start - @@ -4065,7 +4062,6 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return err; } - /* check_stack_write dispatches to check_stack_write_fixed_off or * check_stack_write_var_off. * @@ -4861,7 +4857,6 @@ static int check_sock_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, valid = false; } - if (valid) { env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ctx_field_size = info.ctx_field_size; @@ -6702,7 +6697,6 @@ static int check_stack_range_initialized( if (err) return err; - if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { min_off = max_off = reg->var_off.value + off; } else { @@ -7416,7 +7410,6 @@ static bool is_iter_new_kfunc(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta) return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_ITER_NEW; } - static bool is_iter_destroy_kfunc(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta) { return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_ITER_DESTROY; @@ -11562,7 +11555,6 @@ static int process_irq_flag(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state * return 0; } - static int ref_set_non_owning(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { struct btf_record *rec = reg_btf_record(reg); @@ -16465,7 +16457,6 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) return 0; } - static bool return_retval_range(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_retval_range *range) { enum bpf_prog_type prog_type = resolve_prog_type(env->prog); @@ -18407,8 +18398,6 @@ static void release_insn_arrays(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) bpf_insn_array_release(env->insn_array_maps[i]); } - - /* The verifier does more data flow analysis than llvm and will not * explore branches that are dead at run time. Malicious programs can * have dead code too. Therefore replace all dead at-run-time code @@ -18436,8 +18425,6 @@ static void sanitize_dead_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) } } - - static void free_states(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl; @@ -18719,7 +18706,6 @@ static int do_check_main(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return ret; } - static void print_verification_stats(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { /* Skip over hidden subprogs which are not verified. */ -- 2.55.0
