On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:54:26AM -0500, Shenwei Wang wrote: > From: Shenwei Wang <[email protected]> > > Describes the gpio rpmsg transport protocol over the rpmsg bus between > the remote system and Linux. > > Signed-off-by: Shenwei Wang <[email protected]> > --- > Documentation/driver-api/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.rst | 271 +++++++++++++++++++ > Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst | 1 + > 2 files changed, 272 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.rst > > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.rst > b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.rst > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..7d351ff0adb0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.rst > @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@ > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > + > +GPIO RPMSG (Remote Processor Messaging) Protocol > +================================================ > + > +The GPIO RPMSG transport protocol is used for communication and interaction > +with GPIO controllers on remote processors via the RPMSG bus. > + > +Message Format > +-------------- > + > +The RPMSG message consists of a 8-byte packet with the following layout: > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | 0x03 | 0x04 | 0x05 | 0x06 | 0x07 | > + | cmd | line | value | > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + > +- **cmd**: Command code, used for GPIO_RPMSG_SEND messages. > + > +- **line**: The GPIO line (pin) index of the port.
Here and throughout, please remove any mention of 'port'. This is handled by the endpoint device, i.e one GPIO controller (port) per endpoint. > + > +- **value**: See details in the command description below. > + > + > +GPIO Commands > +------------- > + > +Commands are specified in the **Cmd** field. > + > +The SEND message is always sent from Linux to the remote firmware. Each > +SEND corresponds to a single REPLY message. The GPIO driver should > +serialize messages and determine whether a REPLY message is required. If a > +REPLY message is expected but not received within the specified timeout > +period (currently 1 second in the Linux driver), the driver should return > +-ETIMEOUT. > + > +GET_DIRECTION (Cmd=2) > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > + > +**Request:** > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | 0x03 | 0x04 | 0x05 | 0x06 | 0x07 | > + | 2 | line | 0 | > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + > +**Reply:** > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+--------+--------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | > + | 1 | status | value | > + +------+--------+--------+ > + > +- **status**: > + > + - 0: Ok > + - 1: Error > + > +- **value**: Direction. > + > + - 0: None > + - 1: Output > + - 2: Input > + > + > +SET_DIRECTION (Cmd=3) > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > + > +**Request:** > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | 0x03 | 0x04 | 0x05 | 0x06 | 0x07 | > + | 3 | line | value | > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + > +- **value**: Direction. > + > + - 0: None > + - 1: Output > + - 2: Input > + > +**Reply:** > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+--------+--------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | > + | 1 | status | 0 | > + +------+--------+--------+ > + > +- **status**: > + > + - 0: Ok > + - 1: Error > + > + > +GET_VALUE (Cmd=4) > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > + > +**Request:** > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | 0x03 | 0x04 | 0x05 | 0x06 | 0x07 | > + | 4 | line | 0 | > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + > +**Reply:** > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+--------+--------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | > + | 1 | status | value | > + +------+--------+--------+ > + > +- **status**: > + > + - 0: Ok > + - 1: Error > + > +- **value**: Level. > + > + - 0: Low > + - 1: High > + > + > +SET_VALUE (Cmd=5) > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > + > +**Request:** > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | 0x03 | 0x04 | 0x05 | 0x06 | 0x07 | > + | 5 | line | value | > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + > +- **value**: Output level. > + > + - 0: Low > + - 1: High > + > +**Reply:** > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+--------+--------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | > + | 1 | status | 0 | > + +------+--------+--------+ > + > +- **status**: > + > + - 0: Ok > + - 1: Error > + > + > +SET_IRQ_TYPE (Cmd=6) > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > + > +**Request:** > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | 0x03 | 0x04 | 0x05 | 0x06 | 0x07 | > + | 6 | line | value | > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + > +- **value**: IRQ types. > + > + - 0: Interrupt disabled > + - 1: Rising edge trigger > + - 2: Falling edge trigger > + - 3: Both edge trigger > + - 4: High level trigger > + - 8: Low level trigger I'm in agreement with cmd 3, 4, 5 and 6. > + > +**Reply:** > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+--------+--------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | > + | 1 | status | 0 | > + +------+--------+--------+ > + > +- **status**: > + > + - 0: Ok > + - 1: Error > + > +SET_WAKEUP (Cmd=16) > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I already commented on messages that are not part of the virtio-gpio specification. > + > +**Request:** > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | 0x03 | 0x04 | 0x05 | 0x06 | 0x07 | > + | 1 | line | value | > + +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ > + > +- **value**: Wakeup enable. > + > + The remote system should always aim to stay in a power-efficient state by > + shutting down or clock-gating the GPIO blocks that aren't in use. Since > + the remoteproc driver is responsible for managing the power states of the > + remote firmware, the GPIO driver does not require to know the firmware's > + running states. > + > + When the wakeup bit is set, the remote firmware should configure the line > + as a wakeup source. The firmware should send the notification message to > + Linux after it is woken from the GPIO line. > + > + - 0: Disable wakeup from GPIO > + - 1: Enable wakeup from GPIO > + > +**Reply:** > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+--------+--------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | > + | 1 | status | 0 | > + +------+--------+--------+ > + > +- **status**: > + > + - 0: Ok > + - 1: Error > + > +Notification Message > +-------------------- "Interrupt Messages" > + > +Notifications are sent by the remote core and they have > +**Type=2 (GPIO_RPMSG_NOTIFY)**: > + > +When a GPIO line asserts an interrupt on the remote processor, the firmware > +should immediately mask the corresponding interrupt source and send a > +notification message to the Linux. Upon completion of the interrupt > +handling on the Linux side, the driver should issue a > +command **SET_IRQ_TYPE** to the firmware to unmask the interrupt. > + > +A Notification message can arrive between a SEND and its REPLY message, > +and the driver is expected to handle this scenario. > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + +------+------+--------+ > + | 0x00 | 0x01 | 0x02 | > + | 2 | line | trigger| > + +------+------+--------+ 2 things here: 1) You did not include messages that mask and unmask interrupts at the driver side. 2) We are carrying virtio-gpio messages on top of RPMSG and as such, this whole protocol should be about thar: +------+------+--------+-------- | 0x00 | payload | | Q | | +------+------+--------+-------- Q = 0 requestq Q = 1 eventq The "payload" part is simply the format of the messages as found in the virtio-gpio specification. From there, the only thing left to mention is which messages are not supported, i.e get line names. > + > +- **line**: The GPIO line (pin) index of the port. > + > +- **trigger**: Optional parameter to indicate the trigger event type. Not part of the spec - remove. Given the refactoring work that is still needed, I will not look at the implementation. Thanks, Mathieu > + > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst > b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst > index bee58f709b9a..e5eb1f82f01f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ Contents: > drivers-on-gpio > bt8xxgpio > pca953x > + gpio-rpmsg > > Core > ==== > -- > 2.43.0 >
