On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 9:29 PM Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 5:50 PM Alexandru Gagniuc <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rob
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026, 17:45 Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 01:07:04PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, 08 Jan 2026 22:33:35 -0600, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> >> > > Support loading remoteproc firmware on IPQ9574 with the qcom_q6v5_wcss
> >> > > driver. This firmware is usually used to run ath11k firmware and enable
> >> > > wifi with chips such as QCN5024.
> >> > >
> >> > > When submitting v1, I learned that the firmware can also be loaded by
> >> > > the trustzone firmware. Since TZ is not shipped with the kernel, it
> >> > > makes sense to have the option of a native init sequence, as not all
> >> > > devices come with the latest TZ firmware.
> >> > >
> >> > > [...]
> >> >
> >> > Applied, thanks!
> >> >
> >> > [1/9] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_wcss: drop unused clocks from q6v5 struct
> >> >       commit: 22afc6163c0c7a144d24a09352b87719d64d5f65
> >> > [2/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,ipq8074-wcss-pil: convert to DT 
> >> > schema
> >> >       commit: 2a756ac4d98efc97503629fcaddb2e7c46255824
> >> > [4/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: add IPQ9574 image loader
> >> >       commit: bc33b5b5e23a389e660c3d696cd2e043fdf33ef7
> >>
> >> Why is a 6 month old patchset with reported errors being applied?
> >> Anyways, linux-next is now broken. Please fix.
> >
> >
> > I must have missed the error reports. Can you please point me in the right 
> > direction? I'll get on this ASAP.
>
> "make dt_binding_check" on linux-next.

I see the issue:

      DTC [C] 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,ipq8074-wcss-pil.example.dtb
    Lexical error:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,ipq8074-wcss-pil.example.dts:49.28-51
Unexpected 'GCC_ANOC_WCSS_AXI_M_CLK'
    ...

This is easily fixed by applying PATCH 3/9 of this series ("dt-bindings:
clock: gcc-ipq9574: add wcss remoteproc clocks") [1]. It defines the clocks
used in the yaml example, which resolves the issues. `make dt_binding_check`
is clean afterwards.

Would you like me to resubmit this patch for linux-next?

Alex

[1] lkml.org/lkml/2026/1/8/2278


> Rob

Reply via email to